In this series of Eurofins Agro Testing articles on extreme weather conditions, we turn our attention this time to Southern Europe.
By Clément Fontaine, Manager Agronomy Development and Innovation in France
The drought affecting France since spring 2026 is far from an isolated event. Across Europe, the summer of 2026 was marked by exceptional heat and prolonged water deficits, with the August 2026 JRC MARS bulletin reporting summer crop yields of up to 14% below the five-year average.
France, Spain, Italy and Portugal each illustrate, in different ways, how strongly water availability and soil condition now influence agricultural performance. Yet the impact of drought extends well beyond harvest. While yield losses are the most visible consequence, the longer-term effects on soil structure, nutrient dynamics and biological activity may prove just as important. In many cases, these hidden changes will shape the productivity and resilience of the 2027 growing season as much as the weather itself.

As of 3 September 2026, 75 French départements were classified in drought crisis (VigiEau), 17 under heightened alert, 4 under alert and 3 under watch. Grain maize, one of the crops most affected by drought, is projected to record its lowest production since 1980: 9.0 million tonnes expected, against 13.7 Mt in 2025 — a 35% drop in a single year. Average yield (70.3 q/ha) is down 22.5% on the 2021-2025 average, and planted area itself has fallen by 14.9%. Burgundy is the hardest-hit region, with yields down around 50%, ahead of Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Auvergne and Pays de la Loire (around -37%).
More broadly, French cereal production is down 7.7 Mt year-on-year, and income losses from the June heatwave alone are estimated at €891 million.
Estimates of the 2026 cereal harvest range between 16.5 and 18.6 million tonnes depending on the source (ACCOE, Revista Campo, July 2026), against 21 to 22 Mt in a normal year - a decline of up to 24%. Castile and León, Aragon and Extremadura, historically the leading cereal-growing regions, are the most affected. Soft wheat and barley account for most of the yield losses (20 to 40% depending on the plot), while irrigated maize is holding up better, subject to the water restrictions in force in some autonomous communities.
Olive groves around the Mediterranean coast have also suffered from the heat, and cereal income losses linked to the June heatwave are estimated at €276 million. The cumulative effect: Spain could become a net cereal importer again for the 2026-2027 season.
Italy is the hardest-hit country in the region: Coldiretti puts summer 2026 agricultural damage at over €3 billion, with more than 60% of the national territory affected by drought conditions ranging from mild to severe. The Po Valley is on the front line, with water reserves 30% below normal in Piedmont and down by as much as 50% in Lombardy. The great northern lakes illustrate the strain: Lake Como stands at just 7% of capacity, Lake Maggiore at 3%, Iseo at 11%, with only Lake Garda holding up somewhat better at 46%. The Po itself, at Pontelagoscuro, sits 6.90 m below its hydrometric zero.
Rice yields are down by as much as 40%, maize by up to 70% in some areas, and forage by 20 to 30% in central Italy; milk production has fallen 10 to 20% under heat stress on livestock. One structural figure illuminates this vulnerability: Italy today retains only 11% of its annual rainfall, according to Coldiretti.
Portugal offers an instructive counterpoint. After a severe drought and historically low reservoirs at the end of 2025, a particularly wet winter and early spring in 2026 allowed the Algarve's main reservoirs (Bravura, Funcho, Arade, Odelouca, Odeleite, Beliche) to refill from as early as March. The result: Portugal's irrigated summer crops are, according to data compiled by Carbon Brief, among the only ones in Europe posting a yield increase in 2026. Vigilance nonetheless remains warranted in the Algarve and the Alentejo, the structurally most exposed regions, where the Portuguese state maintains specific water-management measures. Portugal demonstrates how winter water recharge can significantly improve resilience to summer drought, highlighting the importance of soil water storage and reservoir replenishment.

France facing a widespread water-stress crisis, Spain moving towards greater import dependence, Italy where more than half of agricultural land is affected by drought, and Portugal benefiting from the previous winter's rainfall: these four experiences tell from different angles the same story. In all four countries, water availability and soil condition proved to be the key drivers of crop performance, often outweighing management decisions.
But this assessment, drawn from the crops themselves, does not stop at harvest. Beneath the surface, the drought has altered soil structure, chemistry and biology in ways that are sometimes lasting and the return of autumn rain does not erase these imbalances, it often reveals them abruptly. Here, mechanism by mechanism, is what needs checking before committing to the 2027 season.
Clay shrinkage caused by desiccation creates cracks and macropores, particularly in the clay and clay-limestone soils most exposed this summer. These cracks can temporarily improve infiltration, but they often close up poorly: the first autumn rains, falling on bare, hardened soil, promote the formation of a surface crust that, in turn, reduces infiltration and increases runoff and erosion risk. In practice, these structural changes can reduce seedbed quality, limit root development and hinder the establishment of autumn-sown crops.Tillage carried out under dry, hard conditions also raises the question of plough pans and deep compaction, which are harder to correct than simple surface compaction. Finally, biological porosity — the channels dug by earthworms and mycorrhizal networks — has also declined along with the soil's biological activity, a point developed below.
As noted for France, drought limits leaching and promotes the build-up of nutrient salts - potassium and magnesium in particular - which can generate osmotic stress and cationic antagonisms (notably K/Mg) that should be checked before deciding on new applications. Nitrogen and sulphur mineralisation also slows down, without the mobilizable organic stock disappearing: it stays in reserve, waiting for water.
When dry soils are rewetted, microbial activity often surges, rapidly releasing nitrogen from organic matter. This well-known phenomenon -called the Birch effect- can lead to a temporary flush of available nitrate. This sudden increase in nitrate may be beneficial if an actively growing crop or cover crop is present, but it can also increase the risk of leaching following heavy rainfall. On this point, Arvalis notes that even light rain (a few millimetres) is enough to dissolve residual fertiliser and redistribute nitrogen through the profile - a useful reminder to plan final applications rather than waiting for a hypothetical rain to apply everything at once.
Phosphorus requires particular attention: its diffusion in the soil solution is strongly slowed under dry conditions, which can create the impression of a deficiency when the soil's stock actually remains adequate. A hasty interpretation, made without analysis, carries the opposite risk - over-fertilising a soil that does not need it. For this reason, phosphorus fertilisation decisions should be based on soil analysis rather than visual crop symptoms alone
Soil microbial biomass undergoes direct water stress, with partial mortality under prolonged drought - but also a capacity for rapid rebound as soon as moisture returns, which is precisely what drives the mineralisation spike described above. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legumes is restricted by limited water availability, as is the activity of soil fauna, especially earthworms, whose recovery time frequently outlasts the return of rain alone. This biological dimension, invisible in the field, nonetheless determines how quickly the soil can return to normal functioning. Measuring biological indicators can help determine whether soil functions are recovering after drought.
What happens beneath the surface, from summer to autumn recovery of 2026
|
During the drought (summer 2026) |
When rain returns ("Birch effect") |
This autumn: re-test before acting |
|
Structure: cracking, crusting risk rising |
Rewetting shock |
Soil analysis |
|
Chemistry: concentrated salts, slower mineralisation |
Flush of organic matter and soil CO2 mineralisation |
Nitrogen reserves |
|
Biology: microbial stress, reduced activity |
Spike in available nitrate |
Salinity / EC |
|
Leaching risk if soil is bare or poorly covered |
Organic matter and biological activity |
|
|
Plant Status |
These processes combine differently from one field to another, which rules out any blanket rule for the 2027 season. Post-harvest nitrogen reserves may be higher than usual where slowed mineralisation preserved an intact organic stock, or conversely lower where summer storms leached available nitrogen before crops could take it up. This variability adds to the differences already discussed above, linked to texture, rooting depth and each plot's management history. On irrigated land in Spain and Italy in particular, residual soil salinity should also be checked before any new planting, especially where irrigation water was high in sodium.
Mechanically repeating the 2026 fertilisation plan based on the usual benchmarks risks either over- or under-fertilisation. Several checks are needed before committing to the 2027 season:
Whether drought reduced yields, increased salinity, altered nutrient availability or disrupted biological activity, the lesson is the same: measure first, then adapt. The soils entering autumn 2026 are no longer operating under normal conditions, and management decisions for 2027 should reflect that reality.
Sources: JRC MARS bulletin, August 2026; Carbon Brief; Coldiretti / AgenSIR; ACCOE, via Le Courrier d'Espagne; Agreste, via Réussir; IPMA/GPP; Arvalis, via La France Agricole; see also the articles by our colleagues at Eurofins Agro Testing Europe: "Drought in Europe: When soil changes, decisions must change" and "The story of Bulgarian farmer Venelin Delgyanski".