Comparative Analysis of Replication-Competent Vector Quantification: Whole Blood vs. PBMCs in Gene Therapy Monitoring

futuristic-biotechnology-advances-in-gene-editing-technology-for-global-health-healthcare-and-ai-solutions-high-quality-adobestock_1762994670

Compare whole blood and PBMC approaches for replication-competent lentiviral vector (RCL) monitoring.

Monitoring replication-competent lentiviral vectors (RCLs) is an important component of gene therapy safety assessments. This poster compares whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)–based approaches for RCL quantification, evaluating analytical performance, sensitivity, precision, and workflow considerations to support clinical trial testing.

Key highlights include:

  • Comparison of whole blood and PBMC-based methods for RCL quantification
  • Evaluation of assay sensitivity, precision, accuracy, and linearity
  • Assessment of workflow efficiency and sample handling considerations
  • Advantages of whole blood as a simplified approach for RCL monitoring
  • Practical insights for selecting an appropriate sample matrix for gene therapy clinical trials

As gene therapies continue to advance, reliable and efficient safety testing is essential. Learn how whole blood and PBMC-based approaches compare for RCL monitoring and the factors to consider when selecting the optimal strategy for clinical development.

Complete the form below to access this poster.

Comparative Analysis of Replication-Competent Vector Quantification: Whole Blood vs. PBMCs in Gene Therapy Monitoring

To learn more about how Eurofins processes and protects your personal data and your rights, please read our Privacy Notice.